An evaluation matrix was prepared to compare the preferred Build and No-Build alternative. The evaluation involved a combination of both comparative qualitative and quantitative analyses.
EVALUATION MATRIX
Purpose and Need
Meets Purpose and Need
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Traffic Effectiveness
Improves System Linkage
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Relieves Congestion on Local Roadway Network
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Improves Traffic Operations
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Improves Travel Time Reliability
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Enhances Safety
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Enhances Emergency Response & Evacuation
Build: ✓
No-Build: ✗
Potential Right to Way Impacts
Right of Way Impacts (Acres) – Roadway & Ponds
Build: 123.03
No-Build: 0
Right of Way Impacts (Acres) – Canals & Parcel Remnants
Build: 111.67
No-Build: 0
Number of Parcels Impacted
Build: 19
No-Build: 0
Natural / Cultural / Physical Environmental Effects
Archaeological / Historical Sites
Build: 7
No-Build: 0
Public Parks, Recreation Areas (Acres)
Build: 0
No-Build: 0
Section 4(f) Resources
Build: 0
No-Build: 0
Wetlands and Other Surface Waters (Acres)
Build: 90.55
No-Build: 0
Floodplains (Acres)
Build: 0
No-Build: 0
Protected Species and Habitat
Build: Low
No-Build: 0
Potential Contamination Sites (Medium or High)
Build: 4
No-Build: 0
Other Factors
Potential Utility Impacts
Build: 8
No-Build: 0